Adjournment of cases discourage women – Gender Centre
Frederick Asiamah
The last decade in Ghana has seen a great deal of research-based advocacy and
capacity building by gender-based organisations. These activities have
involved many actors. In this profile, the
Gender Studies and Human Rights
Documentation Centre
(the Gender Centre for short) justifies its involvement
in the struggle for gender equity and makes a case for certain policy reforms.
Its first concern is that justice delivery is too slow and efforts toward
securing equitable access to justice for both men and women seem to be
suffering a setback owing to the frequent adjournment of court cases. Many
women in local communities have become fed up with the system due to these
adjournments. The issue needs prompt attention to bring back the confidence
of women as far as the quest for justice is concerned, according to Mrs.
Margaret Brew-Ward, Programme Manager of the Gender Centre.
Background
The Gender Studies and Human Rights Documentation Centre was established in
1995 as a non-profit, non-governmental organization committed to the
promotion and protection of the human rights of women. It envisions a
society where women’s rights are fully promoted and protected, and
where women are able to participate in national development at all levels.
This informs a mission to create a knowledge base through research,
advocacy and allied activities on issues of critical importance to women
aimed at law and policy reform.
Out of the vision and mission have emerged five core objectives.
“Our core objective is to research into key issues that affect
women’s human rights,” said Mrs. Brew-Ward. The full list of
objectives include: to research on key women’s rights issues to
provide evidence for advocacy for legal and policy reform; to maintain and
coordinate a resource centre with both national and international
publications on gender and human rights; and to develop and publish
materials on various subjects related to women’s human rights. The
others are to support the development of networks and coalitions for
improved policy and legal advocacy on women’s rights issues; and to provide
training to major stakeholders in areas of human rights, gender, counseling,
alternative dispute resolution, project planning and implementation,
lobbying, advocacy, rights awareness, and leadership development for women.
Strengths
The Programme Manager posits that the Gender Centre’s most potent
ability is to conduct a research, interpret and translate the findings
into a community-based project. We can say that the Centre has good
reputation in terms of delivering good quality programmes. The Gender
Centre (GC) is also both responsive and proactive and uses opportunities
as they arise.
As well, the strength of the GC is in a multi-skilled staff, which is
knowledgeable in issues of violence against women and children, has
training capabilities, is well-versed in proposal writing, and has
project management skills. Again, the GC has a unique style of not
being directly involved in the implementation of projects but builds
the capacity of local partners and involves them in the conceptualization,
design, implementation and monitoring of interventions for communities.
The changing face of advocacy calls for constant updating and upgrading
of knowledge base and expertise. In response to this, the GC has embarked
on a human resource and organizational development process aimed at
building its capacity to meet the current and emerging demands in its
external environment.
Over the years, GC has also developed a good track record of prudent
financial management and integrity with development partners.
Networking
It is not the tradition of the GC to work in isolation. “We work
with like-minded organisations”, says the Programme Manager. She adds
that networking and collaboration constitute one of the GC’s core strategies
and it allows for learning and pooling of resources for advocacy on women’s rights.
She names ABANTU, the Ark Foundation, the Women Initiative for Self Empowerment
(WISE), the International Federation of Women Lawyers (FIDA)-Ghana, and the
Women in Law and Development in Africa (WILDAF – Ghana) as like-minded
organisations which are implementers. GC plays a lead role in three coalitions
namely the Network for Women’s Rights in Ghana (NETRIGHT), the Domestic
Violence Coalition and the Women’s Manifesto Coalition.
Also, the GC has, at one time or the other, implemented community level
programmes through the following partner organisations in various parts of
Ghana: General Agricultural Worker’s Union (GAWU), Centre for Development
of People (CEDEP), Amassachina Self Help Association, and the Bawku East
Women’s Development Association (BEWDA), Prolink and Rural Watch.
There are also state agencies that are partners either directly or indirectly.
“At the district level where we are working, all our training programmes
involve the police, Department of Social Welfare and the Commission on Human
Rights and Administrative Justice (CHRAJ),” according to Mrs. Brew-Ward.
Other agencies are the National Commission for Civic Education (NCCE) and
the Ministry of Health.
The list of stakeholders cannot exclude chiefs and community members. The GC
also recognizes the importance of the media. Mrs Brew-Ward says creating
public awareness involves great amount of advocacy which in turn requires
the use of the media, especially radio stations.
Funding
The Programme Manager describes GC’s donors as like-minded organisations
which support the GC “either financially or non-finacially.” These
include Comic Relief (UK), WOMANKIND Worldwide (UK), Ghana Research and
Advocacy Programme (G-RAP), Department for International Development (DFID)
of UK, the Royal Netherlands Embassy, the United States Agency for
International Development (USAID) and AWDF.
WOMANKIND has served as a channel for GC’s major donors Comic Relief,
and again was a channel for DFID’s support for GC’s latest project titled
Gender, Violence Against Women and HIV/AIDS, which kicked off last May.
Mrs. Brew-Ward also mentioned the Ghana Aids Commission as funding a project
being executed in partnership with Prolink in the Volta Region.
She could not also forget G-RAP’s one-a-half year core support valued
at $150,000 for the period July 2008 to December 2009. She said the G-RAP
funding was timely, coming at a time “when the Comic Relief funding had
ended and we were still looking for funding because we had developed the HIV
project…That G-RAP support helped us concentrate on proposal
development and…sent proposal to AWDF.” Consequently, GC has
secured funding from AWDF. In sum, the G-RAP funding has helped GC to put
its systems in place such as strengthen its board, communication plan and
revise strategic plan.
Activities
The GC’s core objectives also constitute its programme areas. The
Programme Manager points out that the Centre has been “focusing on
reducing violence against women for the past ten to thirteen years…and
also promoting gender equality.” It adopts research, use of pilots,
working with partners, community based approach, networking and alliance
building, and capacity building for staff, partner NGOs and state agencies
as key strategies to execute its programmes.
There are two major research publications to the credit of the GC. The first
Violence against Women and Children in Ghana, published in 2000
was the result of a 1998 study across the country. By mid-June 2009, the
second paper, The Role of Gender Norms and Domestic Violence in
Increasing Women and Girls’ Vulnerability to HIV/AIDS infection
(2009), which resulted from another nationwide research, was going
through final editing.
“The research report was used to advocate for the passage of the
Domestic Violence Act in Ghana… Also, we used the findings to develop a
project we called the Nkyinkyim Anti-Violence Project. The thrust of that
community-based project was to provide support to abused women and children
even though in the end some men also used the facility or system at the
community level.”
The Nkyinkyim Project, funded by Comic Relief through WOMANKIND,
has since 2005 been expanded from three to 15 communities in four districts
of four regions and is being implemented through four partner organisations.
In the Atwima-Nwabiagya District of the Ashanti Region, CEDEP is implementing
the programme at Kwanfinfi, Nkrumah, Nyinawusu and Serebuoso. GAWU holds the
fort in Akawani, Old Ntronang, Akenkase and Atobriso all in the Kwaebibirem
District of the Eastern Region. In the Upper East Region, BEWDA implements
the project at Teogo, Lamboya, Saaka and Yikurugu in the Bawku West
District. Lastly, Amassachina manages the project at Chansa, Danko and
Kperisi in the Wa Municipality of the Upper West Region.
The Gender, Violence Against Women and HIV/AIDS Project
which commenced in May this year is based on the findings of the current
research, The Role of Gender Norms and Domestic Violence in Increasing
Women and Girls’ Vulnerability to HIV/AIDS infection. From the research,
it is found that “It is not only promiscuity that leads women to be
infected with HIV/AIDS but there are other gender things that we need to
look at to combat the disease.” According to the Programme Manager,
“If we concentrate only on the ABC approach, which is
Abstinence,
Be faithful and Condom Use, we are not going to make headway. But we need
to look at the gender norms especially women in intimate partner relationships.”
The project is funded by DFID-UK through WOMANKIND and is being piloted for
three years in partnership with 3 organizations. Rural Watch is in charge
of the project at Nsokwao in the Koforidua Municipality of the Eastern
Region while Prolink oversees the project at Papesi in the Kadjebi West
District of the Volta Region. The last community project is at Manwe in the
Wa Municipality and is managed by Amassachina. The project is aimed at
minimizing women’s susceptibility to HIV infection resulting from
gender inequality.
In between these two major projects, there was The Safe Schools
Counseling Project, which was a two-year pilot project which
sensitized intervention communities on issues of school-related gender-based
violence (SRGBV) and provided counseling services to abused children. It
was implemented in thirty communities in three districts namely; Ajumako
Enyan Essiam, Assin North and Assin South districts in the Central Region.
The project was funded by USAID through the Safe Schools Project.
As part of its activities, the GC has established and operated a Women’s
Human Rights Resource Centre to provide evidence-based information for
women’s work in Ghana. In addition, it has developed: the Gender
Lens Newsletter which is published biannually. Other publications of
the GC include Information Pack on Violence against Women (2004),
including pamphlets, posters etc.; A guide to the setting up of the
Rural Response System (2008), a training manual on violence against
women; Counseling Manual on School-Related Gender-Based Violence (2008);
and Breaking the Silence and Challenging the Myths around Violence
Against Women and Children in Ghana (2000).
Achievements/Impact
There are two achievements that are dear to Mrs. Brew-Ward. “One of our
biggest successes I’ll say is helping to get the DV Act passed in Ghana.
Because for me…the passage is an indication that as a state we’ve
come to the realization and recognition that violence against women is not
acceptable.” In the run up to the passage of the Act, the GC played a
major role in the establishment of the Domestic Violence (DV) Coalition.
Apart from holding a steering committee member position, the GC supported
the development of the concept for the work of the coalition, provided space
for the coalition’s meetings and financial support towards the
nation-wide consultation on the DV Act.
The other achievement is that through its community-base projects, it has
helped to entrench consultation between men and women in the decision-making
process. “Now you could see women really talking during community
meetings and are contributing and participating in community decision making
which was not the case before this project…and also now in their own homes…
the men are realizing the need to consult women in decision-making whether at
home or at the community level,” Mrs. Brew-Ward stated.
In terms of impact, the GC says it has made substantial impact and will give
itself a score of seven out of ten. On the whole, the GC believes the impact
of women’s rights organisations will measure at least six on a scale
of one-to-ten.
Challenges
According to the Programme Manager, funding is a challenge and the lack of it
means “you are not able to offer better remuneration packages and
therefore not able to retain high caliber staff.” They come and work
with you and after building their capacity over a year or two somebody
snatches because they can offer better working conditions.
Her view is that to combat this, more donors need to consider the option of
core support. “If you give only project funding and you don’t give core
support, how would the organisation even survive and be able to do that work
and develop?” she queries.
On the other hand, “In the district where we’ve been working our
main challenge with the police is the transfers.” The programme officer
regrets that after spending a lot of resources to train police officers on
issues regarding DV, the officers are transferred within a short period,
robbing the organisation of the opportunity to work with experienced personnel.
Even so, the police still have a challenge with resources, especially in rural
communities.
Expectations
A priority is to see women have easy and speedy access to justice. The GC
expects to continue its partnership with other women’s organisations to put
into action the National Platform for Action. One of their immediate concerns
will be to push for a Legislative Instrument that will drive the full
enforcement of the DV Act.
Regarding the fight against HIV/AIDS, the GC will within the short to medium
term push for the adoption of a national policy that will compel all implementers
of HIV/AIDS programmes to include a gender dimension or lose funding for such
programmes.